Honestly
for me, I’m still a little bit lost about intersectional theory but to put it
in simple words I think its when like multiple factors such as maybe your
gender or race play a huge part in your life. Like for me since I’m female and
Filipina, I don’t have that much advantage as suppose to maybe those who are
female and white. I don’t really know how it’s different from the other
approaches that we’ve learned in understanding racial, gender, or class
oppression but personally, I find this approach much better to understand. Like
this approach helped me see how women, even men could be treated differently
because of their race, gender, or even their social status in society. I think
what Audre Lorde means in this quote is that it’s not the differences that
create these different types of groups or oppressions from white women and
women of color, but the way they are holding back in fixing the problem. Like I
guess, she means that they are not exactly making an effort to fixing the
problem. They may talk about fixing it, but are still doing nothing to change
it. I think the steps that Lorde is talking about in order for all women to
achieve social justice and equality is that all women should be able to
acknowledge that every one of them is equal as suppose to seeing them as maybe
poor or weak. That if they are able to recognize those differences and see each
other as equal, then they can come together and help each other out during
their time of struggles. Responding to Moraga ’s
statement, I would have to agree with her because she is explaining or
comparing how being a lesbian is like being poor, being a color of race, and
being a woman. In other words, being a lesbian means you get treated in an
unfair way like those other factors too. I don’t really understand the second part
of her quote when she is talking about “the danger lies in ranking the oppressions….”
But to answer your question about if all of these oppressions are poverty I would
have to say they are because like I stated before, being a women of color and or
being a women in general means getting treated differently, and not in good way too. Like I guess, she is saying that
it’s sad to see every one get treated differently because of their race, gender,
sexual orientation, and etc. But that’s just me though. I don’t really know how
to answer this question. I think intersectional analysis can help us understand
the lives of men also by like their sexual orientation and race. Like for example,
if you were a black or African American man and were queer, then you may not get
a lot of advantages as suppose to men who are white and straight. But that was
back then. I don’t know if that still happens today.
Hi Patricia,
ReplyDeleteI think for the confusion with intersectional theory, I had the same problem as you and when we did the activity in class about our gender, race, sexual orientation, etc. That's when I further understood the meaning of intersectional theory. Intersectional theory is when we look at individuals and compare their gender, race, sexual orientation and other disparities to prove what the person's disadvantages or advantages are. I also agree when you said that if the society recognizes the problem then it would be easier for us to solve the problems in the society.
Hi Patricia,
ReplyDeleteI think Kriselle's explanation does a good job of clarifying. Also, I think that your pre-reading blog had you off to a good start understanding intersectionality- try reading that again and see if it clarifies anything for you. Keep pushing to understand, maybe the readings for next week will help you because they give some concrete examples
--eas